moon calendar

Saturday, 19 October 2013

power pro bite motion

update on Powerpro Bitemotion 
have noticed for sometime there is coating on the line which flakes off 
clumps on the reel line guide, messy
lost a hard running fish after the mainline snapped during the recent March 2015 Kenyir trip 
has never happened with FINS (where only the leader goes)
i retain my trust in FINS but will no longer invest in PP lines despite the popular opinion of many


not prone to changing lines just to try them out 
heavy on the pockets ... so will scout and dig as much as possible on the net 
before trying out anything new 
PP's bite motion was an impulse buy ... two 15lb 164-yard spools 

the orange colour, smooth feel of the line and poundage called out to me 
sticker price of rm100/spool 
second round of using PP lines, first was the 5lb yellow braid on my UL reels

pros: strong, light and limp, smooth, knots seem to hold
cons: colour fades and smoothness fades after some use 


was served a nice helping of Singapore fried meehoon a month or two ago 
had to cut some line; FG-ed the remaining without trimming the ends 
that line and knot was put to the test at fish valley on October 15th when a 2kg jelawat decided to run off with the cut fresh palm fruit at the end of the line

the DAM vittatus lpbc was also tested for the first time since its purchase and use from February 2013
line, knot, reel and rod held; the second hand EA rod felt right at home 
wish the vittatus' line capacity was more though; there were times when heavier lures almost spooled the reeled 




PP bite motion feels thinner than FINS PRT
FINS 15lb seems to hold more water than PP bite motion, most probably due to the perceived reduced diameter of bitemotion
however, naked eye visual says both lines appear to be of similar thickness
for now, PP bite motion seems worth the buy 

the YGK G-Soul is another line worth checking out at RM60/150m for 16lb
bright neon yellow, thin, smooth ... that's for another day 

Fish Valley, Semenyih

finally made it to this popular fishing haunt ... 15th October 2013 
been reading bout it on MFN (for a couple of years before it was shutdown) ... was invited by my sifus
rm30/day for two rods; rm2/pkt of house pellets

pricey, when compared with tow foo sportfishing
nice landscaping, short mini bamboo groves all over the place 
only two ponds are open to the public @ rm30 and rm5
rm30 pond is strictly CnR, while fish caught from the rm5 pond may be taken after weighing and paying

Fish Valley owner, supervisor, patrol duty, restaurant operator ... Michael is a class act
patient, even in the face of the immature, the rude and arrogant
ever ready to teach & share and non-judgemental - classy all the way 

apart from my sifu who hooked up five fish, the rest of us came in at two apiece
good fight nonetheless ... pacus, rohus, carps, African catfish, patins, plabuks, tilapias, Julliene's barbs, etc, are there ... it's a matter of whether one is able to get them
strong pulling and each species with its individual ways of taking off when hooked
both times, the rods did not twitch, did not bounce ... it's all quiet on the water front and suddenly ... the line shoots out and the reel screams 
someone actually lost their tackle, while we were there, when he laid down his tackle and stepped away .... a friend of his yelled to him 'hey ! your tackle's gone into the water ... !'
he was very lucky to have retrieved his set because his line snapped

pond's kinda small so when every angler is close by or adjacent even, lines will tangle and anglers will get together to untangle their respective lines 
anglers that day were understanding and mutually accommodating all around 

the restaurant is quite popular, with non-anglers turning up from all over to eat 
many dishes but a little pricey (as of second half 2014, food prices were confirmed by a Kajang friend and colleague to have increased substantially)  
paintball will be introduced soon if Michael gets his way 
ATVs are available @ rm50/30mins ... grounds are large enough but wish they'd stay away from anglers

3kg pacu on salty chief/stradic 1000/15lb braid/40lb fluoro leader using house pellets

2kg jelawat on EA spiral wrapped 10-25lb/DAM vittatus lpbc (sold off)/15lb powerpro bite motion/40lb 
fluoro using cut fresh palm fruit



both caught on bottom fishing 
shall return when time and pocket permits 

Tuesday, 8 October 2013

do malaysians hereby swear to solemnly tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth OR this IS the gospel truth about malaysian politics OR the truth about hypocritic malaysian despots

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2013/09/27/the-three-stars-chin-peng-najib-and-dr-m/


The three stars: Chin Peng, Najib and Dr M

Mariam Mokhtar
 | September 27, 2013
If communism is so bad, why does the Malaysian government entertain China, whilst demonising the CPM and mistreating Malaysians of Chinese origin?
COMMENT
It is communism which bonds the late secretary-general of the Communist Party of Malaya (CPM) Chin Peng, former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad and Umno Baru president, Najib Tun Razak.
Members of CPM cadres wear a jungle green uniform complete with a cap sporting a badge of three red stars. These three stars signify the three main races in Malaysia – Chinese, Indian and Malay, much like Najib’s ‘1Malaysia’.
Chin Peng preached communist ideology, but the Malaya he envisioned was a country where the races were equal, unlike the Ketuanan Melayu concept of the Umno Baru elite, where Malays reign supreme.
Over the last few days, Malaysians have found a reason to rejoice. Former prime minister, Mahathir has recovered from a bout of amnesia, which marred his performance at the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Project IC, in Kota Kinabalu.
Last week, during a press conference, at the International Youth Centre in Cheras, Mahathir reminded Malaysians that Chin Peng wanted to make Malaysia a communist state.
Amazingly, Mahathir remembered Chin Peng, but it is hardly surprising that he was critical of the communist leader. He is keen to deflect criticism as a prime minister who does not honour agreements.
Both Mahathir and Najib are conscious of their public image. Neither men like being known as untrustworthy. The timing is critical as Mahathir has an election to manage, in which he will back his favourite contender; his son, Mukhriz.
Mahathir tried to project the image of a government that was magnanimous and would help rehabilitate former communist guerrillas. When the 1989 Hadyai treaty was signed, guerrillas voluntarily surrendered and their arms and stockpiles of weapons were destroyed.
However, Chin Peng was barred from entering Malaysia and when he died, his ashes are also prevented from being interred at his family grave near Lumut, for fear that a memorial to honour Sitiawan’s former son would be built.
Mahathir had no intention of honouring the peace treaty. His word is as good as Najib’s “Janji di tepati”.
Mahathir criticised Chin Peng for his communist ideology, but failed to note that Malaysia has become a closet dictatorship, in which the sons of past prime ministers, are groomed, in exactly the same manner as the North Korean communist dynasty.
At least, in a communist state, the financial and social status of peasants is elevated to that of the middle classes, and the upper classes are brought down to the financial and social status of the middle classes.
Everyone is made (almost) equal. In communism, production is controlled by the state and the state owns everything.
In Malaysia’s dictatorship, most of the wealth is in the hands of Umno Baru politicians, their cronies and the government controlled GLCs. In Sabah and Sarawak, the wealth from these oil and timber rich states is inaccessible to the ordinary folk.
The communist threat
Chin Peng may have wanted a communist state but in 2001, it was Mahathir who declared Malaysia an Islamic state. He tried to convince Malays that the Islam preached by Umno Baru was more acceptable than PAS’s brand of conservative Islam. He erased Tunku Abdul Rahman’s secular vision of Malaysia.
If Malaysia was democratic, as Mahathir claims, the rakyat would have been able to throw off the yoke of oppression in GE13, when 51% of the electorate, voted for the Opposition. Yet, the nation is still saddled with the oppressive regime of Umno Baru.
After World War II, countries were rebuilding and Malaya’s riches from rubber and tin, were needed to fund the reconstruction of Britain. In war-scarred Malaya, factories were rebuilt, estates started producing and mines resumed operations. The output was twice what it had been before the war but workers wages were still depressed.
Food was in short supply and the suffering of the people was compounded by the discovery that Japanese war-currency was useless. Malayans were destitute.
Chin Peng’s efforts to obtain better conditions and wages for the workers were futile. He encouraged strikes which turned nasty. His excuse was that he was fighting for the people. At least, he did not commit treason by giving ICs and citizenship to illegal foreigners.
Some people might wonder what Malaysia would be like as a communist state, and make comparisons with the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC).
The economic output of the PRC helps keep the economies of many countries alive. PRC nationals form the highest numbers of tourists to many destinations around the world. Singapore is attracting PRC nationals to work and live on the island, to the detriment of its own citizens. The rate of millionaires and billionaires being formed in PRC is high.
If communism is so bad, why does the Malaysian government entertain the PRC, whilst demonising the CPM and mistreating Malaysians of Chinese origin?
Malaysian schoolchildren are not taught that British forces funded, trained and supplied arms to Chin Peng during World War Two. The combined effort was to liberate the country from the Japanese aggressors. A few years after WWII, the communists waged war on the British because the CPM wanted to free Malaysia from British colonial rule.
Chin Peng’s role in the struggle for independence is not recognised. He is not even mentioned for helping to speed up the process of attainment of Merdeka, although Tunku Abdul Rahman acknowledged that his meeting with Chin Peng, in Baling in 1955, led straight to Merdeka.
Mahathir and this government find it convenient to use “the communist threat” to intimidate Malaysians, but only when it suits them.
Despotic dictatorship
When Najib felt threatened by Bersih’s call for free and fair elections, former IGP Hanif Omar supported Najib’s allegations of a coup attempt and said that he recognised communists inciting violence, from the video footage of the Bersih 3 march.
In the PRC, corrupt officials are swiftly investigated, and if found guilty, are executed with a bullet in the back of the neck. The family is charged for this bullet.
In Mahathir’s Malaysia, corrupt officials don’t believe they have done anything wrong, abuse taxpayers’ monies for personal gain, spirit millions of ringgits out of the country and any investigation against them, dies an early death.
Despite criticising Chin Peng for being a communist who would oppress the people of Malaya, it is Mahathir who reneged on deals and acted in a thoroughly undemocratic manner.
He allegedly used bribery, blackmail and corruption, to maintain his stranglehold on power, whilst oppressing the rakyat with a despotic dictatorship, which masquerades as a democracy.

Mariam Mokhtar is a FMT columnist.
- See more at: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2013/09/27/the-three-stars-chin-peng-najib-and-dr-m/#sthash.ACNVCAgr.dpuf